Visiting Panama not only got me thinking about research ideas, familiarized me with the area I will be working in, and connected me to some amazing researchers, it also taught me some important everyday lessons. Going into the field before the start of your first semester is unusual but I am thankful for this experience because now when I return to Panama I can be better prepared. Now for my lessons from Panama:

1. Coconut oil is used for everything in Bocas. From cooking and baking to moisturizing your skin and hair, even repelling insects. It makes sense because palm trees are almost as numerous as the mangroves here. Just keep a bottle of coconut oil in your dive locker and apply thoroughly to your hair before getting in the sea water. After 8+ hours in the water, rinse in the shower and your hair is still soft. However, you will now smell like popcorn from the oil and salt. This lesson I learned from our intern Mike who has been living in Bocas for 3 years now. The use of coconut oil that I appreciate a little more is warding off sandflies known as chitras. Although I brought insect repellent to Panama, I don’t like to put it on when I will be going into the water because I do not want to poison any of the marine organisms and I haven’t found it effective against the chitras. Working in the mangroves you quickly discover that prior to 8 am and past 4 pm the chitras are out and looking for blood. These little guys may look like a speck of dirt but their bites leave clusters of red, itchy bumps that swell and turn into a rash. Imagine a mosquito bite that gets increasingly itchier and lasts for days. Fun fact: infected female sandflies can carry leishmaniasis for which there is no vaccination or medication against. Some of the locals explained to me that you can coat your legs, arms, any exposed area with coconut oil and it creates an extra barrier so the chitras leave you alone. What really happens is that they still try to bite you but drown in the coconut oil and you are covered in dead and dying sandflies. Then when you shower you can use their little bodies as exfoliants. Let nothing go to waste.
2. Ants rule the rainforest. Even though Bocas del Toro is made up of several islands, all of them have rainforest and ants. There are the Azteca ants whose entire colony lives inside the Cecropia trees which provide them with nectar in exchange for protection from herbivores. These ants do not like you leaning on or touching the trees they protect. Then there are the leafcutter ants who can carry more than 5000 times their body weight and can defoliate an entire tree overnight. They form roads through the forest, cutting and removing leaves, flowers, and grasses to take to their nest as food for the fungus they grow. The fungus is cared for by the ants and will even communicate to the ants through chemical signals if the ants bring the wrong plant material. In exchange, some of the fungus is harvested and fed to the larvae. Now let’s think about the math, one colony contains around 8 million ants. Each of these ants have a stinger, because ants are related to wasps and bees (Order hymenoptera), as well as massive jaws. The jaws of the soldiers are able to bite through leather and can be used to close wounds. Some people call them “suture ants” because if you have an open wound and let them bite it closed, you can then twist of their bodies and their jaws will remain closed for several weeks until you heal. I don’t recommend this technique unless you are in dire need. I have seen first hand how much blood gushes out of these ant bites and they do not bite one at a time. So, what is the result of upsetting or attracting a colony of these guys? Not great. These are just two of the 609 species of ants found in Panama. Now that has been established, my next lesson, ants love sweet smells. Day one in Bocas I discovered ants swarming my bags and legs biting me. Why? Well I discovered them trying to make off with my toothpaste and a sealed package of gum. Now I know that items like gum, mints, cough drops, and flavored vitamins (e.g. Emergen-C) need to be kept in the refrigerator. I also learned that if ants really like what you have to offer they will immediately move their colony as I discovered them carrying their eggs and larva into my laptop case. After physically attempting to shake ants off my computer I learned that DEET does not kill or even deter the evicted ants. Rather, they become angrier and chase you. Lesson learned and I'm just thankful ants have stopped emerging from my keyboard.
3. You can never have too many sandals. Sandals are a necessity when working in the water all day. With other shoes if you put them on your wet feet they never fully dry which can lead to fungal infections and all sorts of fun repercussions. That being said, wearing sandals everyday around town, walking to the beach over gravel and fossilized coral, around the dorm, etc. they quickly fall apart. I’ve gone through four pairs, two of which were Reefs and I thought would last longer.
4. The ocean always wins. The ocean is a beautiful and powerful force. Even if the sea looks calm, do not go into the water wearing a hat, sunglasses, or earrings. On three separate occasions, I lost all of these items to the ocean. Luckily one of our interns was a sailor and was able to recover my hat.
5. Mangrove work requires a full body wetsuit. Being that the typical temperature is 80-95°F (27-35°C) in Bocas, I did not think I would need a full body wetsuit. Instead I wore a shorty and used SPF 80 sunscreen on my legs, reapplying every 2 hours. Reapplying sunscreen only to go immediately back into the water doesn’t really work well. Then when you are snorkeling at the surface for hours the sun exposure to the back of your legs is extremely strong. I learned from first bright red to then purple burns on my calves that my legs would have to be covered. The full body wetsuit also protects you from stinging coral, stinging sponges, jellyfish, anemones and oysters. 
6. Everything must float. When working in the mangroves, everything must float, be in a vessel that floats, or attached to something that floats. The thick, loose detritus layer of the mangroves can easily be disturbed and when it is, visibility disappears. If you bring something into the mangroves and drop it but it doesn’t float, the detritus will quickly cover it and you will be down a tool. We found that empty water bottles work great as floats and since there isn’t recycling or waste treatment on the islands, it is eco-friendly too. Colored flagging tape is also useful for finding the right instrument in a floating bin of tools. 
7. Mangroves are submerged labyrinths. Mangrove islands grow so rapidly and change frequently from human disturbance that they aren’t well denoted on maps. Even google maps struggles with accurate representation. GPS units will not show where islands are so you must learn the islands you work with well enough to navigate them in any condition without assistance. Even once you find the islands you are working with it is easy to get separated once in the water and sound is absorbed. While collecting data in some mangrove ponds our team broke up into two pairs but the pond that was supposed to only have one entrance ended up with four which led to some wrong turns. Despite being 30 ft or so away, shouts from either pair couldn’t be heard by the other. In the end, it all worked out fine but it demonstrated what could turn into a dangerous situation if someone is alone. This also inspired me to consider VHF safety radios (e.g. Nautilus Lifeline) to take with me into the water.

When I first joined this fellowship, I knew I would be working with mangroves but no one ever mentioned to what degree or whether there would be any restrictions. For the past eight years, I’ve been working in academia, there has always been some limitations we had to work within. Whether it be meeting goals of funding sources, making sure our research would be interesting enough to be picked up by journals, following up on a previous study, etc. I have learned to find the box and then push its limits. Over the years there have been countless experiments and studies I’ve worked on as side projects that have yet to be released to the public because the impact is not great enough for big journals to pick up. As a scientist and an inquisitive person, I find it frustrating that science is being filtered this way. With current technology, we can find answers to our questions in seconds with a quick Google search but take a closer look at those answers. Frequently, depending on your question, those answers are presented as fact without any proof or peer review. Where we fall short is when we accept answers at face value instead of taking the time to verify references and validity of the source. Many of these questions that might randomly pop into your head or arise in a conversation among friends are questions researchers have asked and tested but you might never see the results because journals that researcher want to publish in will not accept these papers. Scientific journals, like most academic journals, work on a system of impact factor. The impact factor ranks journals on statistics like the average number of citations of published articles per year. This ranking system of importance of a journal within its field is supposed to help researchers to know what impact their research could have if accepted into that journal. It gives an idea of readership as well as caliber of the journal. Repercussions of this system have been journals during down more papers in search for papers that “are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding” as well as “present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts”, quoted from the information for authors section for the journal Science. Messages like this are now seen with most journals. Other repercussions are journals encouraging researchers to extrapolate beyond the scope of the data, which we as scientists have been taught not to do, and to make it look like the review process takes less time journals will now ask you to resubmit articles as a new submission if the process is taking too long so not to negatively impact their stats. The concept of impact factor has been around since 1975 and, in my opinion and that of many other frustrated researchers, has drastically changed the types of papers you see. So what papers are you not seeing? Well the most common would be a) papers about species not considered important to humans, b) papers that reveal findings that would be fascinating to the general public and probably used in trivia games but do not have a direct impact on humans, c) papers that have negative results. Even once research has been published in an academic journal, which the researchers must pay the journal to publish, many journals also charge people to read them so unless you have a subscription or work with an institution that has a subscription, you can’t read the published article. On top of that, publishing agreements make it so researchers no longer have rights to their own work so they can’t share it for free either. Why then do researchers still publish in journals instead of just posting things online for the general public? The answer is two-fold, first, by publishing in a journal there is a review process where other researchers read the manuscript and filter out bad science or point out flaws in the research. Second, if you are in academia there is a sort of point system towards becoming a tenured professor. You need so many points over a short period of time to secure your position or you could suddenly lose your job. One of the most important categories is publications. Under that category there is number of publications, frequency of publishing, and impact of publications (based on the impact factor of the journal). Publications you co-author have a different point value than the ones you first author and publications you were the advisor for (typically last author) have another point value. This was that game I was coming from. I wasn’t a fan of it, especially since I don’t like to shape my scientific questions to “how do humans benefit from this,” but it was what I had known.
 
Present day, I’m in Panama working in the field everyday picking up any techniques or skills I can and thinking. I started writing down questions that popped into my head while swimming in the mangrove ponds and through the channels separating the mangrove islands. During one phone call with Andrew, I told him about my questions and how I wasn’t finding many answers to them in the literature. I asked whether there were any guidelines or restrictions to my PhD research on mangroves since the description just said mangrove conservation which can mean anything. He told me no restrictions and to send him my list of research topic ideas. This newfound freedom was invigorating as well as terrifying. I don’t have to worry about staying within the framework of a concept or stunting my creativity but at the same time, my mind never shuts off so I knew soon I would be overwhelmed with ideas and want to do them all. Before my conversation with Andrew I thought I might be limited to the mangrove ponds I had been working in so all my ideas were focused on that. After our conversation, ideas starting flooding in. A week went by and my list quickly grew from five PhD topics to one single spaced typed page of bullet pointed topics. I contacted Andrew again and shared my ideas, he told me not to hold back and keep the ideas flowing. Our sampling came to an end so I spoke to Viky about doing some mangrove exploration outside of the ponds. After just one day of traversing the archipelago to experience the variety of mangrove systems we have here in Bocas del Toro, I was up to three single spaced typed pages of project ideas. Knowing that my ideas would only continue to grow and evolve until I selected what I would do for my PhD, the mangrove crew and I spent the rest of our time together surveying potential sites that I could use the following summer. I took thousands of photographs and videos to review while I am in Canada working on my proposal. I believe the photographs and videos will be useful in explaining the system and the questions I hope to address with my research to my committee and collaborators who have not seen my sites yet.
 
Viky and Carl left for Panama City a week before I did but now we are reunited and I have gone into the field with them here at Punta Culebra. Viky is working in the rocky intertidal area looking at predation. Despite having an accident in Bocas del Toro which led to a torn ligament in my ankle, I was hobbling over slippery, algae covered rocks and checking experimental cages that have been placed to see how the communities are impacted if predators are removed or excluded from the system. After attempting walking, I resolved to complete most of this field work scooting to avoid aggravating my very swollen and discolored ankle. The plus side with this method was getting to admire the tidal pools up close and seeing lots of sea hares. While here in Panama City I got to meet with Andrew in person to discuss some of my research ideas and tomorrow we are going to Galeta to see if it would serve as a good comparison site to Bocas del Toro. I am excited to see another one of the Smithsonian research stations and I have heard that Galeta has a lot of crocodiles so hopefully we will see some in the mangroves.